Daily Life and Law

The 1967 Environment: A Year of Awareness

Environmental concern in 1967: the Torrey Canyon spill, the founding of the Environmental Defense Fund, the Air Quality Act and Rachel Carson's legacy.

On this page
  1. A year between two landmarks
  2. The legacy of Silent Spring
  3. Torrey Canyon
  4. The Environmental Defense Fund
  5. The Air Quality Act
  6. Awareness and daily life
  7. Why 1967 matters

A year between two landmarks

Environmentalism was not yet a mass movement in 1967. The word “environment” was only beginning to be used in the modern sense, and the first Earth Day was still three years away, held on 22 April 1970. But 1967 was a year in which several separate strands came together: a very public oil disaster off the coast of Britain, a new kind of legal activism in the United States, and a federal air pollution law. None of them was decisive on its own, but taken together they show how public concern was building.

The legacy of Silent Spring

Much of the background came from Rachel Carson. Her book Silent Spring, published in 1962, argued that pesticides, especially DDT, were harming birds and other wildlife and might threaten human health. Its publication prompted a heated public debate, and the chemical industry challenged her claims. President Kennedy’s science advisory committee reviewed the question and largely supported her concerns. Carson died of cancer in April 1964, but her book had already changed how many people thought about chemicals and nature.

By 1967 the effects were visible in public discussion. People who had never thought about pesticide spraying were asking where chemicals went after they were used, and scientists were more willing to speak publicly. The book did not lead directly to a ban, but it gave later campaigners a base of public attention.

Torrey Canyon

The most dramatic environmental event of the year came on 18 March 1967, when the tanker Torrey Canyon, carrying a cargo of crude oil, ran aground on the Seven Stones reef between Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. It was one of the largest oil tankers of its time, and a large part of its cargo spilled into the sea. Oil spread across the waters off south-west England and later reached the coast of Cornwall and parts of Brittany in France.

The response was improvised. Detergents were used on a large scale to disperse the oil, and in time it became clear that these chemicals could harm marine life more than the oil itself. After attempts to move the wreck failed, British aircraft bombed the ship in late March in an effort to burn off the remaining oil. The results were mixed. The Torrey Canyon spill taught governments that existing law and equipment were inadequate for incidents of this scale, and it led to new international agreements on liability and on preventing pollution from ships over the following years.

The Environmental Defense Fund

In 1967, a small group of scientists and a lawyer on Long Island, New York, founded what became the Environmental Defense Fund. Its first fight was against the use of DDT for mosquito control in Suffolk County, and it used the courts to argue that spraying should be restricted until its effects were better understood. The idea of bringing scientific evidence into legal cases was relatively new.

The organisation grew over the years into one of the major American environmental groups. DDT was eventually banned for most uses in the United States in 1972 after a federal review, although many factors lay behind that outcome and the Fund was only one of the participants. The significance of the 1967 founding is as an early example of lawyers and scientists working together on environmental issues.

The Air Quality Act

Air pollution was a growing problem in American cities, where smog and soot from vehicles and industry were becoming everyday concerns. Congress had passed a Clean Air Act in 1963 and added a law on motor vehicle emissions in 1965. In 1967, President Johnson signed the Air Quality Act, on 21 November.

The new law asked states to work within designated air quality control regions, and to set air quality standards based on federal criteria. Enforcement relied heavily on the states, and progress was slow, with critics saying it was too weak. The 1967 Act is mostly remembered as a stepping stone: it was replaced by a much stronger Clean Air Act in 1970. It also fitted with the Great Society ambition of using federal power to deal with national problems, including cleaner air and water.

Awareness and daily life

Concern was not confined to laws. News of the Torrey Canyon, pictures of fouled beaches and oil-covered seabirds, and reports on smog in large cities reached the public through newspapers and television. Many young people in the United States who were involved in the American counterculture shared an interest in nature, simple living and distrust of industry. Some turned to communal living on rural land, which gave practical expression to some of those values.

Most ordinary citizens, though, still thought of pollution as a local nuisance, and few expected the policy changes that came later. The creation of the Environmental Protection Agency in December 1970, after Earth Day 1970, was still in the future.

Why 1967 matters

The year did not produce an environmental revolution. It produced a set of early signs: a disaster that showed the limits of existing safeguards, a legal group that used courts as a tool, a federal law that proved too modest, and the lasting influence of Carson’s writing. When the movement grew quickly at the end of the decade, those events were part of what people remembered.

The complete guide to daily life and law

Everyday Life in 1967
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →